Material selection




Flywheels are made from many different materials; the application determines the choice of material. Small flywheels made of lead are found in children's toys.citation needed Cast iron flywheels are used in old steam engines. Flywheels used in car engines are made of cast or nodular iron, steel or aluminum. Flywheels made from high-strength steel or composites have been proposed for use in vehicle energy storage and braking systems.

The efficiency of a flywheel is determined by the maximum amount of energy it can store per unit weight. As the flywheel's rotational speed or angular velocity is increased, the stored energy increases; however, the stresses also increase. If the hoop stress surpass the tensile strength of the material, the flywheel will break apart. Thus, the tensile strength limits the amount of energy that a flywheel can store.

In this context, using lead for a flywheel in a child's toy is not efficient; however, the flywheel velocity never approaches its burst velocity because the limit in this case is the pulling-power of the child. In other applications, such as an automobile, the flywheel operates at a specified angular velocity and is constrained by the space it must fit in, so the goal is to maximize the stored energy per unit volume. The material selection therefore depends on the application.

The table below contains calculated values for materials and comments on their viability for flywheel applications. CFRP stands for carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer, and GFRP stands for glass-fiber reinforced polymer.

Material Specific tensile strength Comments
Ceramics 200–2000 (compression only) Brittle and weak in tension, therefore eliminate
Composites: CFRP 200–500 The best performance—a good choice
Composites: GFRP 100–400 Almost as good as CFRP and cheaper
Beryllium 300 The best metal, but expensive, difficult to work with, and toxic to machine
High strength steel 100–200 Cheaper than Mg and Ti alloys
High strength Al alloys 100–200 Cheaper than Mg and Ti alloys
High strength Mg alloys 100–200 About equal performance to steel and Al-alloys
Ti alloys 100–200 About equal performance to steel and Al-alloys
Lead alloys 3 Very low
Cast Iron 8–10 Very low

The table below shows calculated values for mass, radius, and angular velocity for storing 250 J. The carbon-fiber flywheel is by far the most efficient; however, it also has the largest radius. In applications (like in an automobile) where the volume is constrained, a carbon-fiber flywheel might not be the best option.

Material Energy storage (J) Mass (kg) Radius (m) Angular velocity (rpm) Efficiency (J/kg) Energy density (kWh/kg)
Cast Iron 250 0.0166 1.039 1465 15060 0.0084
Aluminum Alloy 250 0.0033 1.528 2406 75760 0.0421
Maraging steel 250 0.0044 1.444 2218 56820 0.0316
Composite: CFRP (40% epoxy) 250 0.001 1.964 3382 250000 0.1389
Composite: GFRP (40% epoxy) 250 0.0038 1.491 2323 65790 0.0365

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

History

Flywheel

Table of energy storage traits